© AFP PHOTO/Jim WATSO |
No
Arms to Russia
By Dmitry Sidorov Sep. 23 2010 -
12:32 pm |
||
|
The times when the
West was surprised and overwhelmed with the Russian oligarchs’ hunger for
luxury are almost history now. There are smiling faces of European and the
U.S. company heads here and there but in general we got accustomed to a
nouveau riche pattern of their behavior. The arms-starved
Kremlin stepped in instead recently,announcing its $619 billion
ten-year shopping-spree plans to
purchase weapons and military technologies abroad. This news was
unveiled by Anatoly Serdukov, the Russian Minister of Defense during his trip
to Washington last week. The Kremlin’s idea
of the arms purchase from the West goes much further and is much more
frightening then a simple import of high-precision weaponry. So it happens,
according to Serdukov, that the Russians are seeking a license to assemble
the Western arms at their plants and factories in Russia. If successful, the
Kremlin will be able to kill more then two birds with one stone: First of all the
Russians will deny leverage to the West in the event that relations go south,
instructors and engineers are called off, and Moscow is denied spare
parts shipments for the supplied weaponry. Second, arms
assembly in Russia will ensure the Kremlin a continuous supply of advanced
military technology to its armed forces. Given the totally unacceptable
behavior of Moscow leading to the 2008 Russian-Georgian war, and the
Kremlin’s aggressive posture towards the former Soviet countries, this is by
far one of the worst decisions the West has come up with since the 1960s. Third, no
stipulation in weapons and technology transfer contracts prohibiting the
Kremlin to sell assembled weapons to questionable states will be obeyed by
Moscow. The Russian arms supplies to Syria that ended in the hands of
Hizballah during the Second Lebanese War in 2006 should serve as a clear
confirmation of total absence of boundaries. As well as Moscow’s recent
weapons shipments to Iran and Venezuela, that only added insult to Washington’s
injury. Hats off to the
Kremlin that produced a brilliant idea marking a new approach to previously
awkward and sometimes scandalous lobbying attempts in Washington! By offering to pay
a very serious amount of money for advanced U.S. arms and military
technology, the Russians are not only providing jobs for thousands of workers
at home, but also pressuring American arms producers to lobby the Congress
and the White House on behalf of the Kremlin. Given the professionalism and
the contacts on the part of the lobbying firms serving the U.S. military
industrial complex, we can be almost assured that the Russian arms deal will
be seriously considered. If that were not enough, the history of U.S.
military interactions with the Soviet Union, and the USSR’s record of faulty
compliance to signed international agreements, should sober up Obama
administration officials, as well as Congressional and Pentagon leaders who
might be inclined to embrace the Kremlin’s offer. In 1955 the U.S.
Senate Committee on the Judiciary produced the following conclusion after
looking into the Soviet historical record: “… in 38 short years since the
Soviet Union came into existence, its Government had broken its word to
virtually any country to which it ever gave a signed promise. It signed
treaties of nonaggression with neighboring states and then absorbed those
states. … [We] seriously doubt whether during the whole history of
civilization any great nation has ever made as perfidious a record as this in
so short time.” During the Korea
and Vietnam wars, Soviet tanks, planes, artillery tractors and the ships that
delivered it to the North Korean and North Vietnamese Armies were either
built by Russian plants and put together by the U.S. companies, or were
constructed thanks to technology transfers from Washington to Moscow. The
list of betrayals is long, and the record — either past or modern — is not
very promising, to say the least. The U.S. should be extremely careful when
dealing with the Kremlin no matter how lucrative their offer can be,
especially when it comes to arms and sensitive technologies. This is not
exactly the deal on frozen chicken we fought so long to renew for export to
Russia. It is not even a purchase of Boeing civilian planes by Moscow, where
we convinced them to go for in exchange for new computer technologies. The
late George Carlin once said “… we are Americans, we are for sale…” What if
he wasn’t kidding? Originally
published at: http://blogs.forbes.com/dmitrysidorov/2010/09/23/no-arms-to-russia/?boxes=financechannelforbes
|
|
|