THE
TURKISH-ARMENIAN RAPPROCHEMENT PROCESSES: A CASE STUDY APPROACH Jack Kalpakian, Volkan Ipek / DIGEST OF MIDDLE
EASTERN STUDIES / Volume 20, / Issue
2 / Pp.
291–321 / Fall 2011 Map:
Andrew Andersen, George Partskhaladze / 2007 |
|||
|
Abstract Using a
case study approach, this study examines Turkish and Armenian attempts at constructing
a more positive relationship. It
argues that the two countries need to look at what binds them in a web of
mutual responsibility towards each other as states first. The only legal link between the two
countries is the Treaty of Kars which updated an earlier treaty. Given that the Turkish Armenian
Reconciliation Commission and the Turkish-Armenian Accords were both
failures, this paper argues that Armenia and Turkey need to litigate their
differences on the basis of their only binding agreement. I. Introduction The
process of reconciliation between Armenians and Turks is regarded by many as
an exercise in futility. While there
are clear positive incentives for the two states and the two peoples to move
forward with the project of reconciliation, it is also clear that the
obstacles facing such as a project are extensive. This paper argues that the two attempts to
move the process forward failed because they were not owned by Turks and
Armenians. They were created mainly at
the initiative of the United States for the sake of its own interests in
Transcaucasia. And while there is
nothing particularly sinister in the United States’ pursuit of its energy and
strategic interests in the region, the United States proceeded without due
consideration of the depth of the problems between Turks and Armenians, and
failed to lay the groundwork, in both positive and negative incentives for
both sides, required to achieve the breakthrough it sought. The foci of this paper are the Turkish
Armenian Reconciliation Commission (TARC) and the 2009 Turkish-Armenian
accords. Each of these
events/agreements is treated as a case for the purposes of this study. The paper consists of seven parts. In the first part, we discuss the text of
the Kars Treaty and the obligations it brings to both Turkey and
Armenia. In the second part we present
the normative parameters of this work, including its limitations. In the third part, we provide the framework
of analysis used for this paper. The
fourth part consists of the TARC case, while the fifth part examines the
accords. The sixth section examines
the lessons learned from each episode and looks at where the process fell
short. The final part provides some
reflections and policy recommendations that are, in our view, more realistic
than those that were made by some of the principal participants in the
process. Press here
to read the whole article About the authors Jack Kalpakian
is Associate Professor at Al Akhawayn University Ifrane Morocco · International Affairs Expertise: International Security, International Political
Economy, Middle East and Africa Education: B.S., Political Science, Santa Clara
University, Santa Clara, CA; M.A. and Ph.D., International Studies, Old
Dominion University, Norfolk, VA. Background:
Originally an Armenian immigrant from Sudan, Kalpakian is a native speaker of
Arabic and WesternArmenian, as well as a
naturalized United States citizen Volkan Ipek
is Researcher at AFSAD, Bilkent University Expertise: International Security, International
Political Economy Education: AFSAD, Bilkent
University |
|
|